Bence Magyar
Bence Magyar
Indeed it is a valid point but I'm still quite uneasy about it. Why should we aim to support non-ROS-compliant robots? Where does this stop? Should we also implement optional...
There is nothing stopping anyone from porting it but we don't have it in the works at the moment. Are you interested in doing it?
Thank you for contributing to the roadmap, added!
After rebasing and playing with this locally a bit I noticed how transmission handles are broken by it :/ unfortunately that bit of code specifically relies on the nullptr functionality....
I also think we shoudl only use either gtest or gmock in the repo, but *at least* in a single package for simplicity and cleanliness.
we are using gmock in all the packages AFAIK but it could be worth a check
@Karsten1987 @destogl @v-lopez @mahaarbo
Thanks @NourS-d ! If you have any questions feel free to ask here or tag along to one of the Working Group meetings (next one is next Wednesday) to discuss
@Karsten1987 @v-lopez @mahaarbo
The title may be a little extreme :) > Also is it a blanket ban on exceptions? > > Of course there are places where they may still be justified....