Beatriz Esteves

Just to point out that with OAC ([w3id.org/oac](https://w3id.org/oac)), you can already communicate/create a policy that states that sharing with others is prohibited, e.g., ``` :example-4-2 a odrl:Policy ; odrl:profile oac:...

Thanks for the reply @elf-pavlik Is there a direct mapping between the terms in [OP metadata spec](https://openid.net/specs/openid-connect-discovery-1_0.html#ProviderMetadata) and the ones in the [Solid OIDC vocab](http://www.w3.org/ns/solid/oidc#)? I can guess a few,...

> Is there a particular reason you need OAuth2/OpenID Connect terms explicitly defined as IRIs? All entities involved in the Solid ecosystem, including identity providers, should provide at least basic...

Proposal: ``` PREFIX profile: PREFIX role: a profile:Profile ; profile:isProfileOf , ; profile:hasResource dpv:html, dpv:primer, dpv:use-cases, dpv:examples, dpv:ttl, dpv:jsonld, dpv:n3, dpv:rdf . dpv:html a profile:ResourceDescriptor ; profile:hasRole role:specification ; profile:hasArtifact...

Indeed, the artifact link is broken. Also, in the DPV metadata beyond the serialisations, we are missing a `profile:hasResource` with the HTML documentation, which should have `role:specification`. In the GDPR...

> I wanted them in so we can distinguish between the RDFS/SKOS and OWL variants - unless that's something that doesn't conform to Profile requirements? Makes sense, then yes indeed,...

Should we also have fulfilment justifications to ground why a certain right is being exercised by a data subject, e.g., the justifications on GDPR Art. 17.1 and 18.1?

Using the model started above by @coolharsh55, I'm compiling a list of justifications in this [webpage](https://besteves4.github.io/dpv-rights-exercising/) and in this [spreadsheet](https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/14_-lL_419dDKw4XTyBWtjpIJz5KuTbjGRy53VrylY9M/edit#gid=0). Feedback is welcome on either document. Next I will also...

Hi, here are some updates on the rights exercising / justifications work: - The justifications in Article 34.3 do not fit in the model started above, so we suggest adding...

Makes sense. I updated the spreadsheet [here](https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/14_-lL_419dDKw4XTyBWtjpIJz5KuTbjGRy53VrylY9M/edit#gid=0) to accommodate for these changes. The subtypes of Not Required Justifications are now prefixed with `JNotReq-`, the subtypes of Right Non-Fulfilment Justifications with...