Benjami
Benjami
Is there anything which I (as Skript maintainer) could do to improve Pore compatibility?
@denis-zhdanov I eventually hacked around the issue. Not a proper fix, but appears to be working well enough for now: ``` tasks.getByName('jmhJar').doFirst() {duplicatesStrategy(DuplicatesStrategy.EXCLUDE)} jmh { duplicateClassesStrategy = 'exclude' } ```
Feature request here has nothing to do with inventory click event. Suggested syntax is not good, but since this is not a pull request it doesn't really matter. Many issues...
Inventory click events already deal with different types of clicks. Maybe we could steal some ideas from there.
Seems that I looked at outdated roadmap. Java 8 is getting a few more months of updates than I thought. I'll update the original post. Note that it seems unclear...
I have not noticed any issues. It is possible that some plugins do not work well. Also, Minecraft client doesn't really work with Java 9+ as far as I know....
I did remov some methods due to changes to internals. And even before they were removed, it was required to call another method before actually loading the script to parse...
It is planned, but no ETA.
Current variable system does not handle huge databases well. It loads everything to memory and occasionally *saves* that everything to disk, if I remember correctly. That is of course not...
Since variable integrity is not guaranteed in new alpha builds, I decided to make somewhat experimental change that might (or might not) help with this issue. In practise, setting variables...