benbenw
benbenw
no pb but due to java type boxing it should be backward compatible to the callers
> @benbenw sorry for the long delay on this. I'm just curious about what scenarios the return type could be null here. I see 2 places we return: > >...
I don't understand your question. :worried:
:disappointed: The application using statement or preparedStatement (or preparedStatement with highly dynamic query which make the cache nearly useless) has little interest in this discussion. I was clear in the...
> If a state is required, then why don't we just add a constructor to Parser class and use it accordingly? Because the parser is just a bunch of independent...
@bokken this patch is about parsing performance. I don't know why the discussion focused on sub-optimal applications. You can have a "quality" application with a lot of setReadonly true/false call...
rebased change the naming make the buffer holder less intrusive add comment
rebased correct the javadoc
done + missing `@After`
The query parsing / transformation in `CachedQueryCreateAction#create`.