Benjamin Peinhardt

Yeah to be honest for me the query builder is pretty great, and I don't feel an overwhelming need for anything more powerful. The reasoning behind using something like that...

@stevepryde so the basic idea behind https://github.com/bcpeinhardt/valid_selectors is up and running (for xpath). I have a pull request to get the binding we needed into the libxml crate but right...

Completely agree, no good reason to have this as a non dev dependency, and certainly no need to build it into thirtyfour. No, on the crates page for the library...

This is the most serious attempt at a Rust equivalent to libxml that I found on crates.io https://github.com/shepmaster/sxd-xpath

Well hold on now I dismissed it when I saw build failing and the older commits but I'm going to give this a once over. I spy an xpath parser...

That sounds good! I'll follow up here when I figure out everything that's actually being checked at compile time and when the binding gets merged. It really bugs me that...

I ended up writing some sort of type checking helper functions that deal with options here: https://github.com/bcpeinhardt/formulaY/blob/main/src/util.rs The part about checking options is largely converted from a stack overflow answer.

Are there keyboard shortcuts that correspond to all the panel toggles? Might be able to mimic the behavior by remapping the keybindings for file system and terminal to the same...

I really dropped the ball on this one, sorry about that. They did end up merging that additional binding. I still think a sort of validate_xpath! macro is a decent...

I'd like to try my hand at this. I think to start I'll just add support for named field syntax and go from there.