Joris Kraak

Seems related to #90 (this one is newer and hence the duplicate).

I'm sure I'm missing some details, but I gave filling out the form a stab. # New package manager questionnaire Did you read our documentation on adding a package manager?...

Thanks for the pointers. This confirms my expectations for how to best deal with this. Trying to address this has been on my radar for a while, but I haven't...

> Some of them reminds me of this framwork [diataxis.fr](https://diataxis.fr/) which I tried out for the logging ecosystem at [julialogging.github.io](https://julialogging.github.io/) Looks like that's the original definition, thanks for sharing. I...

When the documentation of SciML packages is read through https://docs.sciml.ai, perhaps the logo of the individual component should also be hidden? This is relatively straightforward to achieve using some CSS....

The recent issues may not be related to the original issue, but given that `LERC-4.0.0+0` was released three hours ago, that seems like the most likely culprit given my experiments...

> is there no way to only download the required files instead of the full tarballs? 🤔 Unfortunately not 😞 At least not when relying on package servers. That would...

> we should start that discussion on the package server repo, so they hopefully consider it. it would be a huge win for renovate. I have started the discussion in...

> are we stuck on this PR if the upstream issue is unresolved I don't think we are. I also suspect it to be likely that even if the ask...

This PR was accidentally created due to a configuration issue with the corresponding GitHub app. Someone with sufficient privileges should close this PR.