Bartek Górny
Bartek Górny
> XEP-0199 is about Ping, the one for privacy lists is XEP-0016, Of course, my mistake. > As an entity is a user OR any service, I don't see a...
> This makes me think that probably the new way of delivering stanzas ignores or breaks stream management. Looks like this, indeed.
The idea seems fine, except for I wouldn't change the db structure. The benefit from it is limited, since we rarely have to implement new auth method, while the hassle...
I'd also suggest a general rule "one major refactoring per release". This one would then saturate the spring one.
As the name of the sample module, load or overload would be fine. But names of the hooks should be more generic - you can implement any type of spam...
On the other hand, one could use the same mechanism for rewarding users for clever things they say (if somebody invents an algorithm to tell clever things from stupid)
Because if you add it again with different sequence number it is going to be executed twice, which may not be what you want.
Actually there does not seem to be a need for it now, but I can imagine a situation where you launch a pool of processes, which may grow and shrink,...
True, that would be a good practice. My point is actually that current behaviour is inconsistent - either we allow multiple registration, then we should do the refcount, or we...
Good point, you're right. That would enforce care and consistency. I don't have a definite opinion which way we should go, so guys feel free to decide.