Bernhard Elsner
Bernhard Elsner
No, to be fair, the issue was flagged up to me in the context of archive and I just took on writing a ticket to make sure it doesn't get...
I still think we want this feature. I don't mind waiting a little, but targeting 2.6 would be a good thing imo.
Thanks @simonletort-da . Sound like a good idea. I've asked @ray-roestenburg-da for review as his team owns the involved libraries and linked issues.
And indentation :)
My feeling is that a possible resolution would be to go the direction of @hurryabit's idea to split out "multi-party submission" read and write from each other. If I understood...
My major concern with this is that the behaviour of an application becomes implicitly dependent on topology. It now matters whether two parties are on the same participant or not....
Why do you say it's not backwards compatible? Any successful command submission now would also be a successful command submission with this change. Some error messages would change, but since...
That is true, this may have to be an opt-in feature, just like I'm suggesting it would have to be on Script and Sandbox.
@meiersi-da the problem actually extends to exercises as well so we'd have to reduce all authorization failures to simple "fetch/exercise failed" messages without any further information. It's a possible solution,...
Fundamentally I believe that divulged contracts should not be available for interpretation at all as they lead exactly to the problem that you can never remove them from the Index...