baknu
baknu
From a mail dd 28th Aug 2022 from BK to SR: > Het is me opgevallen dat voor de RPKI-testcategorie alle resultaatstatussen actief worden gebruikt. Zie: /RPKI-test/test/. > Dat is...
We currently only count 'redirect' and 'include' as DNS lookups, but not 'a', 'mx', 'ptr' and 'exist'. See RFC: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7208#section-4.6.4 Exceeding 10 DNS lookups is a common SPF error: https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/tzink/2016/02/19/common-errors-in-spf-records/
Sometimes swithing the language when on a news item does not give the corresponding news item in the other language but the newest.
Layout of tech table "DMARC existence" subtest gets messed up by longer DMARC records. See for example the results of the domain baaten.com.
So Matomo currently offers: Option 1. Masking 104 bits for IPv6 (2001:db::) combined with 24 bits for IPv4 (198.0.0.0). Option 2. Masking 80 bits for IPv6 (2001:db81:85a3::) combined with 16...
In the tech tables of subtests we could directly link to the relevant results of expert tools like: - https://dnsviz.net/ (DNSSEC) - https://routinator.nlnetlabs.nl/ (RPKI) Note that we already have a...
The RPKI test section of the connection test will consist of two parts: 1. Test if the user's IP addresses are RPKI signed (i.e. have a valid ROA); 2. Test...
We currently do not test for DNSSEC algo's (#34 ). We could already refer to the best practice (proposed standard) on DNSSEC algo's (https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8624.html#section-3.1) See also thread on: https://twitter.com/internet_nl/status/1536090824777388033 For...
From mail GT (13th of June, 2022): > The iteration part he mentions is only relevant for resolver resources > not the zone itself. If they are going to change...