ay-ex

@berlotti Thank you for confirming it is currently not available. Similar to @andyward I fear extending regex (albeit welcome) will still not help in that use case. (I tried it...

@berlotti thank you for your suggestion. I would fear the answer is no: If these were two separate specifications, we would get our `IfcBuildingElementProxy` 0-point-marker pyramid elements (which are in...

@berlotti Thank you so much for the explanation! So if I am reading this right, spec1 and spec2 work together to form the exclusion of pyramids via MaxOccors. I have...

@berlotti I tried your approach with two specifications as I understood it from your suggestion with this ids: [gh_exclusion_test_2specs.ids.txt](https://github.com/buildingSMART/IDS/files/12452843/gh_exclusion_test_2specs.ids.txt) but it seems the restriction of spec2 has no effect on...

@andyward thank you for your suggested approach, unfortunately that triggers the following error: ``` xmlschema.validators.exceptions.XMLSchemaValidationError: failed validating {'minOccurs': '0', 'maxOccurs': '0'} with XsdAttributeGroup(): Reason: 'minOccurs' attribute not allowed for element...

@andyward it is indeed. With minOccurs removed, it starts to complain about maxOccurs: ``` xmlschema.validators.exceptions.XMLSchemaValidationError: failed validating {'maxOccurs': '0'} with XsdAttributeGroup(): Reason: 'maxOccurs' attribute not allowed for element ```

@berlotti thank you for the explanation, then it is as I initially assumed. But then I guess two specifications would not have helped me for the case: I have a...

In another use case I invoked BlenderBIM from pyRevit, to patch up broken rvt-ifc-exports. But surely it is more trivial to start external python with ifcopenshell, than starting the rhino.inside...

@sweco-begertjanvdb : oh, I had not heard about rhino compute yet - a rhino rest api server - fascinating! 🙂 but is that run in the same rvt-memory-context as rhino...

ok I see, a long-shot indeed. but thank you for elaborating! then in that scenario rhino.inside would not even be needed, as the geometry conversion would need to happen on...