Avtar Sehra
Avtar Sehra
@elaineo I have just done that now.
@mikeyb Yes that is right. I will close.
@whatisgravity it is really great to see you here!
@splix this is interesting. But would this make previous contracts deployed incompatible with this change? @arvicco It seems in this case the "From" address will always be the sending account,...
@whatisgravity apologies, progress on this slowed down due to focus/time being required on another ETC dapp delivery priority that I needed to meet for a demo we want to do...
@kimisan that is great, thank you for your interest. Are you also on slack? If so what is you username, then I can add you to the OOP private channel.
Yes I agree. This is why we could even utilise the approach suggested in the ECIP, but just use an arbitrary constant hash for the change. Maybe something that can...
I had a detailed chat with @splix on this, around using a dynamic value for the appended value in the signing and validation process. The outcomes of this made sense...
@igetgames with the new modification the following is not the case: > However it does not provide replay prevention within the same chain, or compatible chains (e.g a private chain...
I have made an update to the ECIP by formalising the math, so the appropriate reference block number can be calculated quickly using just the current block height. Also I...