Andrei Tomashpolskiy

@npgall, hi! I'm speaking on behalf of @ruslansennov as we've recently become colleagues :) We've done [some measurements](https://github.com/FinamTrade/liblevenshtein-java/pull/1) to find out if there is a significant performance gap in `liblevenshtein`...

@npgall , thank you for the answer! Good news is that we've been able to get rid of all dependencies without incurring any penalty:) We'd like to know if you...

I'd prefer to stick with one event bus per runtime, but this is definitely a (minor) memory leak, so it would make sense to remove torrent-specific listeners, once the torrent...

I guess it's around 30 bytes per connection, does not seem so critical. But again, I agree that this needs to be addressed.

I agree :)

Thanks! Can you post version/revision in which this bug occured and if it happens regularly or not and/or depends on some preconditions? On Wed, 14 Apr 2021, 14:33 Mikhail Bobrutskov,...

May I ask you to try out 1.9 revision? I never saw this before On Wed, 14 Apr 2021, 23:29 Mikhail Bobrutskov, ***@***.***> wrote: > happens on latest master, with...

This is a good observation. However, tracking individual block requests and responses would be an overkill. How about increasing default timeout to 2 minutes?

On the surface, this looks good. But there might be a problem with time-tracking individual blocks in that the sender will not always send the requested blocks with equal intervals....

I think we can just replace the existing option with a new relative metric: _max amount of time to receive one unit of data (e.g. 1 MiB)_ Then calculate session-specific...