bindings
bindings copied to clipboard
AsyncAPI bindings specifications
#### Reason/Context I'll make sure and state upfront that I'm relatively new to asyncapi and don't know everything there is to know about Google Pub/Sub either. My statement of facts...
### Describe the bug you found in AsyncAPI Docs. The https://github.com/asyncapi/bindings/blob/master/jms/README.md#examples shows ```yaml servers: production: url: jms://my-activemq-broker:61616 protocol: jms protocolVersion: '1.1' description: The production ActiveMQ broker accessed via JMS. ```...
#### Reason/Context Please try answering few of those questions - Why we need this improvement? In https://github.com/asyncapi/spec/issues/466, security protocol and sasl mechanisms were added to the security scheme. However, the...
**Description** On reviewing the binding it seems the `required: true` status for the `queues` property of the `sqs` binding was not intended. There were examples from the beginning that show,...
Update the bindings with the learnings from this repo: github.com/asyncapi/enterprise-patterns/.
@raveclassic commented on [Fri Nov 15 2019](https://github.com/asyncapi/asyncapi/issues/294) **Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.** Currently `ws` channel bindings allow you to define some query/header parameters: https://github.com/asyncapi/bindings/tree/master/websockets#channel-binding-object However...
**Description** Draft PR to add github action to the bindings, for updating the docs inside AsyncAPI website. **Related issue(s)** #251
**Description** Information about transacional topic is important from the consumer perspective as it requires appropriate properties being setup on its side _(isolation.level='read_committed')_. Moreover, property like _commit.interval.ms_ might affect latency on...
**Description** The current AWS policy binding configuration doesn't match what is offered by AWS when configuring IAM policies. Condition and Resource are missing and Principal isn't fully fleshed out. This...