Artem

@BernardZhao > I don't know what the correct `authorizationUrl` and `tokenUrl` ```python keycloak_url = "http://127.0.0.1:8080/auth/" realm = "test" oauth2_scheme = OAuth2AuthorizationCodeBearer( authorizationUrl=f"{keycloak_url}realms/{realm}/protocol/openid-connect/auth", tokenUrl=f"{keycloak_url}realms/{realm}/protocol/openid-connect/token", ) ```

Yes. SQLAlchemy 1.4 does not skips such joins. I'll try to fix this bug.

This cannot be done now. But it will be a nice improvement! 👍 Now I don't have time for this task. Maybe someone can do PR...

Hi @bhavnish07! I have reproduced your example here https://github.com/art1415926535/graphene-sqlalchemy-filter/tree/issue_35/examples/groups_and_tasks. Everything seems to work fine.  

Nested connections are managed by graphene_sqlalchemy. You can override `FilterableFieldFactory` (registry is graphene_sqlalchemy object) and set to `FilterableConnectionField` as `factory` variable.

*Adding 'implicit' filters* sounds like you need your own custom resolver. graphene-sqlalchemy-filters must be used for explicit filters for clients.

Not very easy but most likely possible, I think. You need to override some parts of `FilterSet`: * `_generate_filter_fields` to create a GraphQL schema in a different way https://github.com/art1415926535/graphene-sqlalchemy-filter/blob/f6c2123d4f19c99e2d48c342088f9ec7f09cb667/graphene_sqlalchemy_filter/filters.py#L571 *...

This is an interesting task. It is possible that this module can have several types of GraphQL schema. **Pros:** * the user can choose the type of scheme **Cons:** *...

What type of data is stored in VARBINARY? Can you give some examples of sqlalchemy queries you are interested in?

Haven't seen any cases where mapper.entity returns None. It would be great to have a test or example.