Alex Armstrong

I would like to start thinking about this (and think it is heavily related to issue [304](https://github.com/finos/architecture-as-code/issues/304) re: business domains). If we went with [datacontract](https://datacontract.com/) or [dataproduct](https://dataproduct-specification.com/), we need to...

Some additional content here from @ojeb2 on https://github.com/finos/architecture-as-code/issues/450#issuecomment-2403346305. Propose we remove `database` from node type, introduce `data-asset`. A database is then a node of type `service`, with data-assets deployed-in. Similarly,...

For example - here is what I think traderx might look like. Have used composed-of vs deployed-in. ```json { "nodes": [ { "unique-id": "traderx-database", "node-type": "service", "name": "TraderX Database", "description":...

@LeighFinegold yes @jpgough-ms cool - will rework in a real example.

I would suggest going for Option 1. Document looks fine, but would suggest either adding additional fields to aid with auditing or capturing via separate documents. E.g., suppose bob has...