Nitin Suresh comments

Results 10 comments of


                                            Nitin Suresh

Option to use System Preference for Light/Dark Theme

Hi, I would like to take up this issue

Option to use System Preference for Light/Dark Theme

@Siedlerchr no problem, I'll try one of the other issues

[WIP] Extract PDF References

@koppor that is great to hear! Thanks for adding the offline functionality for this feature

feature request: extract pdf references

I would like to take up this issue!

[WIP] Enhance customization of entry types

Hi! Should [org.jabref.logic.exporter.MetaDataSerializer#serializeCustomEntryTypes](https://github.com/JabRef/jabref/blob/359dc320f5eb2f9a700ca3f01c049cf11dc2552a/src/main/java/org/jabref/logic/exporter/MetaDataSerializer.java#L157C1-L158C1) be updated so that custom entry types are always serialized to the `v2` format going forward?

[WIP] Enhance customization of entry types

Same here! 😄 Thankyou for the pointers! I think we would have to use `v2` in all cases where a custom `FieldProperty` is specified, even if it is just a...

[WIP] Enhance customization of entry types

> Thinking aloud: We should not do, because of too many changes in the bib file: write v1 always and v2 *additionally. The reader then needs to prioritize v2 over...

[WIP] Enhance customization of entry types

Hi @koppor, the parser has been updated so that [org.jabref.logic.importer.util.MetaDataParser#parseCustomEntryType](https://github.com/JabRef/jabref/blob/09683ed7df4bc03bfd71a4baddc46f77bcb5abb7/src/main/java/org/jabref/logic/importer/util/MetaDataParser.java#L36) can parse both v1 and v2 entry types. Regarding backward compatibility, it looks like even if we write both v1...

[WIP] Enhance customization of entry types

Thanks! I’ll look into support for that too