aooating

Results 11 comments of aooating

> Hey, I actually got very simular results to yours after 45 epochs: > > Current class AP50: tensor(71.8500) Current class Precisions50: 5.193744085759178 Current class Recall50: 87.56551145946715 Known AP50: tensor(71.8500)...

> Hey, I actually got very simular results to yours after 45 epochs: > > Current class AP50: tensor(71.8500) Current class Precisions50: 5.193744085759178 Current class Recall50: 87.56551145946715 Known AP50: tensor(71.8500)...

> Hello @orrzohar-stanford @aooating The paper uses 2 open-world splits and I have provided config files for both the splits. Can you specify which split is causing the problem? /data/OWDETR/VOC2007/ImageSets/t1_train.txt

> The results for these splits are present here -> https://arxiv.org/pdf/2112.01513.pdf in Table 6 As for the results of 19+1 setting in Table 2, I only got mAP 61. I...

In the iOD experiment, is the split of VOC dataset, such as ft.txt, different from the random selection? | | aotingzh | | ***@***.*** | 签名由网易邮箱大师定制 On 8/5/2022 23:14,Akshita ***@***.***>...

> Hello! @aooating Is there a gap between your results and the original in other settings(10+10 setting or 15+5setting)? Yes. I didn't train the 10+10 setting. In the 19+1 and...

> Hello, thank you for your great work. > > In your code and your paper, you mentioned that spatial (summing width and height separately) shows better result, ensuring plasticity....