andyleap

But they do turn a profit. They take 1% of every donation. Admittedly, that's a very small portion, but it's non-zero. I imagine some groups would prefer that they recieve...

oh, yay, so the money goes to running services that many people have already explicitly stated they don't want you to run on their behalf.

Honestly, the only way to solve the problem would be to make it completely opt in. Repo owners would have to add their repo to the site. As it is,...

yeap, you are right. The obvious end result, therefore, and I have seen it, is to use licenses that aren't so open, and to stay away from large services like...

Yeap, it's all true. The downside is that a lot of developers have this expectation that the open source community is friendly, and that asking politely for someone to respect...

Well, as you said, we're on shaky ground. This isn't forking or distributing the project, this is using the project's name and description on a third party site. Kinda like...

My implication, by bringing up Iceweasel, is that open source licenses don't grant you any additional rights to the name of the project, hence why Debian's fork wasn't allowed to...

Make it opt in. Also, thank you for another reason to go to a self hosted git setup, so I don't have to deal with crap like this.

@lavagetto Best they could do would be opening an issue on the repo that got searched for. Sending an unsolicited email for a service where tip4commit would be getting profits...

Fixed length fields are handled by incrementing the `0` portion, rather then having to increment the `i`. The generator only emits the `i` once it's been incremented, which means structs...