Andrés Pereira de Lucena

Hi @BoFFire, Thanks for your proposal. This has been discussed in the past in [Metadecidim](https://meta.decidim.org/processes/roadmap/f/122/proposals/16937): > I think that before adding yet another social network, we should think again about...

Hi @sinaeftekhar. I agree that the configuration setting is a bit too much. Let's skip it. If someone wants to disable it, they can always override this text on their...

Thanks for the report @lawrencemcn! With the last developments of v0.27.0, we dropped support for `ico` format, as that didn't play nicely with the Add2HomeScreen feature from the Progressive Web...

@ahukkanen I was thinking about this issue last night, and I actually think that the problem is on the base64 conversion itself: it shouldn't kick-in. After #7712 and #7713, these...

Heads-up @ahukkanen, there are some failing specs. Some are related to the last set of changes.

Hi @ferblape. We're trying to clean the backlog of open PRs. I see that this one isn't finished, and didn't receive any update in the last month. Are you planning...

Hello @lawrencemcn I didn't have the chance to reproduce this locally but I've found the traceback at the server: ```ruby NoMethodError:undefined method `conference_conference_registration_path' for #  from actionpack (6.0.5) lib/action_dispatch/routing/routes_proxy.rb:50:in `method_missing'  ...

Regarding the lack of internationalization, it's confirmed and I can reproduce it. Regarding the date itself, it should be the date when the conversation was created. Just to confirm, this...

😨 This is a mess, specially when there are old conversations (like from years ago) this is really broken. We should define a correct date format. For usability reasons we...

Hi @przemad I think this was a bug of the v0.25.1. We've just released v0.25.2, could you install it and regenerate the app? Thanks