Andre Löffelmann

Hi @darrellwarde , ah I see, did not get that out of the docs. Well, we have some node properties in neo4j which might be `null`. However, from the GraphQL...

Corresponding Zendesk ticket: [here](https://support.neo4j.com/s/case/500UN00000ABv5HYAT)

@a-alle, why has this been re-labelled as `feature request` and removed from bug triage? It is clearly a bug. The API produces inconsistent data. @neo4j-team-graphql confirmed that.

Hi @darrellwarde, thanks for your quick reply! I understand that a solution is not possible at the moment. If so, don't you think it would be best to remove the...

Another thought on this: In theory it would be possible to re-model the Product-Price thing to: ````graphql type Product { id: Int price: Price! @cypher(statement: """ MATCH (this)-[:PRODUCT_HAS_PRICE]->(p:Price) RETURN {"currency":p.currency,...

> You are quite possibly right that we should remove it - it would actually be a removal of the entire connectOrCreate operation for any type which has one or...

Hey @darrellwarde , any news on this? Since v6 is out and nothing has been changed regarding 1:1 or *:1 relationships, can you tell us about your plans/roadmap? Will the...

@Liam-Doodson any chance to fix this soon? We have paid Aura enterprise support and this issue holds us back from going live with v7

hey, @MacondoExpress , @darrellwarde any chance to speed this up? Should I open a ticket at the support portal? We cannot go live with v7 without this bug being solved....

Hi @MacondoExpress , thansk for the quick fix! I just have tested it and can confirm that it works :) 👍🏻