Anderson Luís Furlan
Anderson Luís Furlan
@jteppinette Yeah! This is why I ask to @johnpapa. I think with your code is very relevant and could be included in him angular style guide. Ng-include remeber languages like...
I agree with @jteppinette. ng-include seems only one not to let the html at all on the same page, which makes no sense at all. It will be a reusable...
@dietergeerts In your case, for items a directive should be created. It is the best way to do. You can see in several angularjs books including, in your example, a...
@dietergeerts And as well remembered by @jteppinette, has the scope that can treat it.
@johnpapa Of course not, I think just an elegant way to do what ng-include do: directive. Ok, let the people discuss. :+1:
But I think the should not even exist because if your HTML page is big enough to need to use the ng-include, probably you should separate your logic into smaller...
@hrajchert Yeah! That's a way to think too. Easier to read. You can keep your scope in your directive. So why not use directives all the time? A more semantic...
I follow a certain syntax in the guide to create them and submitted to the package control repository. Being in Package Control it is becomes an easier alternative to installing...
All right, I will see yours, merged them and make a pull request for you, what do you think?
Thanks @joshtoo @MAustinMMDP! I will see your commits and add snippets follow their styles. I don't merged yet with the Guide. So I will add them and merged with snippets...