amdfxlucas

@kevin-w-du could you please at least briefly confirm my [observation](https://github.com/seed-labs/seed-emulator/issues/20#issuecomment-1946438032) that two concurrent routing-daemons (FRR & BIRD ) operating next to each other on the same node, just because a...

@magicnat @kevin-w-du Could you please review https://github.com/seed-labs/seed-emulator/pull/181#issue-2164803611

@magicnat I've had a few thoughts about how to implement different routing daemons. I came up with the idea to use some kind of an intermediate routing configuration (specification object)...

@kevin-w-du , @magicnat I made some [experience](https://github.com/amdfxlucas/seed-emulator/tree/toppology-overlay-final/client) with overlay-network visualisation myself. ## What I did is : - deploy overlay-multicast peers on endhosts - mount a shared volume into all...

no, but the changes are in coordination with @martenwallewein

I chose to distinguish the kind of routers into border-routers and intra-domain-routers , because I think it is simpler and more expressive ( i.e. its really just Registry::getByType('brnode') ), than...

@kevin-w-du Appologies for my oversight, how about 'brdrouter' for border-routers ? With the change to IntFlag for NodeRole I wanted to correspond to the circumstance that one node might have...

@wonkr @kevin-w-du done ! :) please check again.. Could you please also comment on [this](https://github.com/seed-labs/seed-emulator/issues/177#issuecomment-1984212708)

@wonkr Hey, what has become of this ?! :)

@kevin-w-du, @magicnat In my opinion there is another reason, why the Routing Layer needs care. There is no concept of a RoutingProvider yet. The RoutingLayer uses the BIRD routing daemon...