alisman
alisman
@jamonholmgren could you comment on this?
What the heck!? How is this not easily answered? It seems like we are all trying to do something the wrong way?
@tmazor from what i can tell, this is all based on the presence of profiles in the study. If there is no profile, we show the desired message. But it...
@tmazor yes that makes sense.
@dippindots @gblaih per Tali's comment above, this ticket is about the case when a there ARE molecular profiles but particular patient/samples are NOT profiled. @gblaih will need help with how...
Cases: 1. Study have no profiles for given alteration type: "Study has no [type] data" 2. Study HAS profile, but sample is NOT profiled: "[Sample|Patient] is not profiled" depending on...
We will follow up with better treatment of scenario with two samples where only one is profiled.
@sbabyanusha this got overlooked when we released. There are some SVs with eventInfo of type "Antisense fusion" and others with "ROS1-TMEM181 Fusion". Where they used to be the same in...
@sbabyanusha reports that data will normalized in second release of SV data, at which point this issue should be resolved.
@inodb fixed the tooltip issue. for the legend, can you expand on the idea there?