Alexandre Essteves

It seems to me that code that imports `generics-sop` (or `base-sop`) can have other instances for K/I in scope if they import other libs that define them. Though I'm not...

Maybe we could instead have 'smaller' building blocks? ```haskell toSet :: Map k a -> Set (Arg k a) toMap :: Set (Arg k a) -> Map k a ```...

Oh nevermind, you already stated all that in https://github.com/haskell/containers/issues/814#issuecomment-1023539195 . I thought containers avoided functions that were easily derivable from already exposed ones (unless a specialized version was more efficient)...

@ohri-anurag they're in `src-bin` nowadays

> result-ios/bin/run-in-sim: line 26: $1: unbound variable My memory's on the matter a bit hazy, but I *think* https://github.com/reflex-frp/reflex-platform/pull/294 addressed this particular error at the time. There were other simulator...

Seems like this now leads to an infinite reload cycle ```diff , mtl , text + default-extensions: + x exposed-modules: ``` ``` (...) Reloading... /run/user/1000/ghc24799_0/ghc_35.hspp /run/user/1000/ghc24799_0/ghc_40.hspp:1:14: error: Cannot parse LANGUAGE...

We inject cabal extensions in their package modules so that multiple packages can exist in `ob run` even though ghci itself doesn't distinguish packages and would just mash all extensions...

I'm also not sure if we should let unknown extensions through. Even without the inifinite cycle it seems like a typo there would lead to a confusing error message

> What if we didn't take an argument but instead inferred whether or not you wanted hlint based on the presence of an .hlint.ymal file? Tricky. hlint will crawl up...

> adds too many unnecessary constraints on I once tried addressing that by [pushing the constraints deeper](https://github.com/obsidiansystems/obelisk/pull/542#issuecomment-570609478) via `Dict`, but I tend to agree with https://github.com/obsidiansystems/obelisk/pull/542#issuecomment-570609478 being possibly better if...