Artemi Krymski
Artemi Krymski
Interesting - what does CEF let you do that Electron doesn't?
Why would you want to use higher level constructs in LLJS? Personally I'd rather write a module in LLJS that I can invoke from regular JS - that's all that...
Instead of freeing malloc'ed memory when JS objects are GC'ed, why not simply return clones of those objects as hashes? If you export an LLJS function, then it must return...
Indeed, but what about the other way round - convert TypeScript to LLJS? And then LLJS -> C means you get TypeScript -> LLJS -> C -> native in theory...
I'm really talking about the LLJS that compiles to asm.js - not the "superset of JS". If you only allow typed JS, then why not just remove "let" and translate...
That's not quite how I saw it but sure. At first glance it seemed to me that LLJS is effectively a C-like language that can be compiled to javascript, not...
How about something like Automatic Reference Counting instead?
I have boost 1.67 but the python module still doesn't build on High Sierra
I think the easiest solution here would actually be to go the other way: support a minimal subset of HTML & CSS in V UI. This is the approach taken...
@memeone I'm afraid you're misunderstanding. I'm not suggesting reimplementing HTML at all. I'm merely suggesting borrowing concepts from XML & CSS - take a look at the way React Native...