aisaac
aisaac
An annex would sound good!
@glenrobson is your question about adding granularity info in the response annotations, or as a parameter in the query (i.e. that the user could want to be given only results...
@tomcrane @azaroth42 @mattmcgrattan I'm catching up with older msgs... I see the 'discovery' label you've added. How should we handle the discussion on this? Should it be an issue in...
Discusses in TSG call [10 June](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AM1AefGtF3CS2j2KjMkX3LhdQLxX1w6ZhZAyiUOgf4c/) and [2 Sept](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vRtt-EMSrDuIrj5nShq9DOiiMMerQTvk-Gvedoe-z8o/)
Wondering: wouldn't this be a case for negotiation by (and declaration of) profiles as in https://www.w3.org/TR/dx-prof-conneg/ ?
When this ticket is agreed to be in scope, we can close #40
IIIF Discovery call 2017-07-26: agreed to be in scope
In scope: context could be collection, exhibit, web page for object, search results.
@nfreire thanks for having created this. I am puzzled about the elicited need in the end of the description, though, as well as in the title: our draft spec at...
In notes call 12-7-2017: UV does this already at manifest level, collection level (share dropdown in lower left corner)- not sure about canvas level - this could be under client...