afischerdev

The second screen shows parameter changes. You will find this in the serviceconfig.dat (folder ./Android/media/btools.routingapp/brouter/modes) This changes not the profile text but the call of the profile with different parameters....

@vodie Thanks for your explanation, I can't say anything about OsmAnd, I'm only a rudimentary user. However, my proposed test (ferry on/off) showed that BRouter still has problems here, or...

@ProBackup-nl > lookups.dat support's already multiple values, for this it looks to me like a good idea to add also support for multiple keys Hmm, that doesn't look very practical...

@Totorrr Thank you for looking into the still unresolved problems. The unused constants are removed by @quaelnix with this [changes](https://github.com/abrensch/brouter/pull/598/commits/c38a9186fd9ce4c50a8a3a1063678fe079fb5be7). The `consider_traffic` problem is still present. The `estimated_traffic_class` is always...

@Totorrr Sorry for the delay. You are right, I think I was looking at the BRouter web profile and missed the current profile in repo.

@Totorrr I think we can close. And I can't see a performance improvement, if no consider_noise it should jump direct to the end of block and assign a '0' ....

@devemux86 Thanks for the ideas, They are online on test server now - car_fast profile.

@devemux86 > The pseudo tags may need stronger costs? Maybe, I did not care about the values, just copy it from trekking profile. But If you have a look at...

@devemux86 > From the trekking profile in main server? From [BRouter code](https://github.com/abrensch/brouter/blob/master/misc/profiles2/trekking.brf)

@devemux86 Could you make some tests with the update #860 and the new kinematic and weight class?