afischerdev

At some point there will be an update to lookups.dat. I thought it might be a good idea to try this: `highway;0000002942 abandoned disused razed demolished dismantled no` The low...

I'm not sure if I understand your issue. Do you have a sample for us? Best done with [BRouter-Web](https://brouter.de/brouter-web/)

Is it ok when I use this data on [BRouter-Web](https://brouter.de/brouter-web/#map=13/47.8347/13.8019/standard&lonlats=13.778915,47.853075;13.776083,47.81728&profile=car-eco)? I'll take a look at it one day.

Inside the tunnel is no elevation data available- as shown above. But when you look into our way data the points are present ``` 476.25 447.25 ``` And will be...

1 fine to hear this about the quality. We are on the way to use this source as well. But it will take its time. 2 `line between both portals...

@ppete2 This data is available in the Json export. Sample: `["13789746", "47830291", "453", "267", "0", "0", "0", "0", "0", "reversedirection=yes highway=primary surface=asphalt maxspeed=70 lit=yes lanes=2 foot=no bicycle=no tunnel=yes", "", "122",...

> .bef files should use the same naming scheme as .rd5 instead of mimicking as SRTM tiles Good idea, this is the main feature for me. The current naming includes...

Added obstacle key in #458 But `line` and `lock` are not added, they have already seamark tags.

@sjakobi > maybe this issue rather belongs at https://github.com/abrensch/brouter/issues. Yes, I think so. I'll have a look on it.

The points of the route are all outside the defined distance. So I would think at the moment, it belongs more to the use of a simple circle around the...