Lorenzo Affetti
Lorenzo Affetti
@fortytw2 seems great! Anyways I could change the option to get only the stack. I added the id because is was available, I don't know if somebody would ever use...
@fortytw2 is this good to go for you or need something else?
@fortytw2 just pinging you 😄
Hey @rsobrochado! Thank you for your interest! Not that I know now. This issue has been iceboxed. Do you have any precise requirement or use case to tell us?
@nathanielc `reduce` gives you the ability to aggregate and forces your output to be the accumulator. Stateful UDFs would give you the tools to add state to any higher order...
@wetterfrosch yes, you need a `map` with state 👍
No, it's not, unfortunately. As a workaround, can't you manage your case with `StateCount` or `StateDuration` (https://github.com/influxdata/flux/blob/master/docs/SPEC.md#statecount)?
Think I quite understood 👍 I see two ways of doing that: - enable explicit triggering for users: if you could tune result triggering on a per-row basis, your `reduce`...
@zarbis Sorry for the long delay. @zarbis I think `union` performance at the moment is not something we will work on, but I absolutely don't wnat you to hang on...
@nathanielc @jlapacik I like how you worked that out. Especially > The pipe argument must always be the first positional argument (this simplifies function unification and function definition syntax as...