Austen Sharpe
Austen Sharpe
Hi! Has this feature been added yet? I'd also like to include a gradient feature in my sankey
This will be worth addressing in #1735
@cmgosnell did we fix this?
**QUESTION**: This issue entails merging CEMS data with an output table. To my knowledge, we've never included CEMS in an output table before. How should we go about doing this?...
This text is from my last commit, but it's very relevant! The epacems crosswalk file does not have a date field. It does, however, use foreign keys from eia tables...
**Still to do:** Test crosswalk `unit_id_epa` values against actual CEMS data **Update**: Done!
**Latest changes:** These changes are based on the conversation in #1758 First, I changed the EPA-EIA crosswalk from three tables to one. The previous tables figured that there was a...
> As far as the naming of the crosswalk goes, what's the reporting / data umbrella that all that information is coming from, if not the EPA CEMS? Should it...
> maybe something like `power_sector_data_crosswalk` or `epa_eia_power_sector_data_crosswalk` I'm torn between using similar language to the EPA and keeping it simple. Given that all our data pertains to the power sector...
I think my favorite thus far is `epacamd_eia_crosswalk`, but maybe just `epa` makes more sense for column suffixes. I also don't know the extent to which we would ever integrate...