abdgad
abdgad
+1
Thanks a lot for your work on this huge PR. Do you have any estimated release date for the db version?
> 2. The original block is marked with a TODO, which identifies it as a task. I would like to understand why the reference to this block also needs to...
> Regarding this feature, since it is not a native syntax of Logseq, it is still under consideration at the moment. This feature could be disabled by default and people...
Downgrading Requests to 2.31 causes conflicts with other pip packages that require Requests >2.31. So this is not a good solution IMO.