Arnoud Delissen

Some questions we need to think about before we can implement this: - How does the user know which material properties are used by a module? We don't want the...

From #21: > Maybe we can have some way of overriding with a standard argument for the 'general' assemble operation. What I mean is something like > > ```python >...

> Is it possible for a Module to put an array of references of input signals to the output signals? > This way the user could define any sequence of...

Yes, now we're talking. If user wants to add their module to two Networks at the same time we could use ```python with pym.Network() as fn1: ... with pym.Network() as...

I implemented a minimal working version of the proposed syntax for the compliance example (eac24863cae28f34193df71c186614bec51f10cd). Some observations - User could potentially use a module twice with different signals, which would...

I've updated all the code in branch [improved_syntax](/aatmdelissen/pymoto/tree/improved_syntax) ready for someone to check it out. Also the [documentation](https://pymoto.readthedocs.io/en/improved_syntax/auto_examples/index.html#examples-topology-optimization) has been updated with an examples gallery (new style). During rewriting the...

Closed with pull-request #29