Aaron McDaid

By the way, I'm relatively new to working with others on github. I've just realised that maybe I should have sent a pull request to @iitalics instead, as this extends...

I haven't had any time for Hackett in recent weeks, partly because of a C++ conference I attended (Meeting C++ 2017, it was fantastic!). But maybe I will again in...

Love the rewrite, @iitalics . I've only just now managed to read it fully, learning more Racket on the way (parameters and `parameterize`). There is an issue with `random/io` where...

I guess this Issue can be closed now? I guess the PR mentioned just above, by @sihamon , solves this? (I ask because I'm hoping to find and solve some...

Ready for review I'm not sure if I should tag somebody (@callebtc ?) or add a label or something to say that this is ready for review. This is my...

> @aaronmcdaid please excuse the delay. Thank you for this PR, and nice tests. I wonder if it is necessary to do the OVERRIDE_ and to set up a new...

A question about NUT-17 that seems to be relevant for this test: Does NUT-17 allow duplication, i.e. a state message to be sent to the websocket even if the state...

Is there anything I can do to advance this PR, or is it good as-is? I see some of the test pipelines timed-out after six hours > The assertion change...

I've pushed that change here just a few seconds ago, to allow duplicates and to test more directly what we want (first==UNPAID, last==ISSUED, with PAID appearing at least once in...

I'll have a go that that now. First, I'll ask _Claude Code_ if it appears that this has already been implemented *__PS__*: update, it appears not to have been implemented...