A1730
A1730
**Please add a Server API.** This will allow for other server implementations. Currently we have a choice of Jetty or Netty (Undertow is moving to Netty) with Jooby. However, Netty...
Awesome. Thank you. > On Aug 25, 2020, at 8:15 AM, Edgar Espina wrote: > > > The API is: io.jooby.Context, a server implementation must provide a context. It...
Time for JPMS review? We tried to use modules in the past and I believe there were split modules between jooby-core and jooby-test.
Thank you for giving consideration to this wacky request. We currently use [ActiveJ ](https://github.com/activej/activej) extensively and it brought Intellij annotations dependency with it. Then some wise guys started using eclipse-jdt...
One thing we decided was no runtime dependencies for Nullable annotations. This ruled out checker framework. We wanted the runtime safety but we were uncomfortable with the technical debt (one...
> The problem with the second issue manifest error is that you need a newer docker version, 24+ is a must. > > Or you can take binary artifacts directly...
Thank you for looking at this issue @sbordet . I was going to add that we are probably doing something wrong hence the ask for a tunable ... However, we...
Thanks @sbordet . I used curl and it worked (this was on the jetty server) - Linux, it hangs when I went through the browser ( m$windows.) So I decided...
Hi @sbordet, I took some time to go through the log files and the only difference that I can see between the failed upload and a successful one is ```AsyncContentProducer@2e02eaba```...
This may help someone someday. We found out after lots of digging that it was not a Jetty issue naturally 😉 This issue is probably due to different interpretation of...