ZhenLian
ZhenLian
> Please include the language in the title for "L" proposals. Thanks! Sure, sounds good!
@yihuazhang Hey Yihua, can you please take a look at the `Custom Authorization` section? That part remains almost unchanged. I included some examples a the end, and it would be...
> Hi, this looks great, however we were wondering if this can also support TLS-PSK (Pre-Shared Keys)? > > For TLS 1.3 the TLS-PSK mode enables 0-RTT handshakes, reducing overhead...
@yihuazhang Yeah this is in my list, but feel free to take another look if possible. Sorry about the delay - I was busy with perf&intern stuff, etc in the...
@markdroth Mark, can I know in general, when do we expect a gRFC to be merged? Do we merge it when the proposed API is implemented, or we merge it...
Yeah, overall I agree we should improve the security blogs and add more guidance to grpc.io, especially with the coming of many new security features besides authentication, such as authorization...
Hi @wjohnst3 I think our first step is to fix the error message. I will help doing that, and let's see what will happen after that. In the meantime, I...
Update: the current ownership of the ALTS-related stuff is a bit unclear, and we(me and @matthewstevenson88) raised our questions a couple of months ago, but unfortunately still haven't got any...
Sorry for the delay. I am just back from vacation. ALPN missing is considered as a severe failing: if the ALPN fails, the handshake would be considered not successful, and...
Or could it be cloud-dot-net is building against a OpenSSL/BoringSSL version that doesn't support ALPN?