Zero Ekkusu

Deploying and verifying via scripts should be mentioned in this section, so those who are learning know there's an alternative way. It's likely many are going to prefer it for...

Yeah, it's a good idea. Contributors should check at least: - `forge test` (test with latest solc version) - `forge build --contracts src/Test.sol --use solc:0.6.0` (compile `Test` with solc `0.6.0`).

Wen PRB Test powered by Forge Std? > Proposed changes - #78 Sgtm. I propose the filename to be `SafeVm.sol`, interface `SafeVm`, instance `vm`. - #13 This would be a...

`>= 0.8.0` If we are going to continue supporting earlier versions, then only PRB Test can do it. > install both Forge Std and PRBTest Yeah, that's also an option.

Update on CapWords: We could add `forge-std/CapWords/*.sol` in `v0.3` and use PRBTest instead of DSTest. Those contracts would not be backward compatible. Everything would be inherited/delegated to `forge-std/*.sol` contracts to...

> I don't think there is any compelling reason for us to bundle PRBTest in Forge Std instead of DSTest. If you're referring to what I said above, that is...

> given the fact that these are debug events and they do in fact make them stand out more, which I think is desireable Good point - in that case,...

We were not all on the same page here, but we've resolved some issues 😄 Re `CapWords` @mds1: This is actually a compromise solution to correct all names and make...

We should decide whether to bump pragma to `0.6.2` to get interface inheritance. See https://github.com/foundry-rs/forge-std/pull/147#discussion_r944974402. I've opened PRs for the remaining changes.

When should we merge?