YairMO
YairMO
Hi, Thank you for addressing this issue. The source diffusion (please note that this term is known as source diffusion rather than cross production source term) term in the SU2...
To make sure that the formulation is stable, it should be verified that the sum of the coefficients is always positive. Diskin addressed this issue in great detail.
Sorry, but I didn't follow through with all your work. Did you also modify the Jacobian due to the new additional diffusion flux (actually diffusion and anti-diffusion fluxes)?
Do you have a written draft?
Yes, thank you.
Thank you for sharing. I'll look at it tomorrow. On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 8:40 PM Rutvik Khedkar ***@***.***> wrote: > *Bot-Enigma-0* left a comment (su2code/SU2#2508) > > >...
Thank you again for sharing. Please find below my comments: 1) The function f_n in Eq. 3 multiplies all terms in the square brackets. However, comparing Eq. 2 (seems correct)...
Thanks for your explanation. On Fri, May 30, 2025 at 11:48 AM Rutvik Khedkar ***@***.***> wrote: > *Bot-Enigma-0* left a comment (su2code/SU2#2508) > > > 1. Thanks for the catch,...
I'm looking forward to your findings On Fri, May 30, 2025 at 12:03 PM Yair Mor-Yossef ***@***.***> wrote: > Thanks for your explanation. > > On Fri, May 30, 2025...
Hi, Regarding the cross-diffusion term (CD) that appears in Omega source term (residual). The SST model (1994/2003) is a high-Reynolds-number model. Namely, It can not predict correctly the sub-layer region...