Eloi Démolis
Eloi Démolis
I didn't think of this. Thank you for the review and workaround.
I like your approach better! Talking about specialized types for a specific "direction", I think there are a lot of messages and payload-related types and it's not always clear what...
I tried to apply some of my renaming propositions on a [branch](https://github.com/Wonshtrum/rustls/tree/message-types-rename) of my repo. What do you think about it? I really like how ownership becomes an implementation detail...
Awesome work! Sorry, I didn't see the message earlier. I would like to propose a last change. It pushes the logic introduced by the renaming even further, I would understand...
I think that’s the logical next step after the message types refactor. I quite like how it avoids conversions from and between `Message` and the specialized inbound/outbound types. But maybe...
I'm fixing them
My understanding is that there are fundamentally two types of messages: decoded messages and encoded messages. Decoded messages are represented by `Message`, and encoded ones can all be represented with...
I agree and I think you got to the same conclusion as what I said in my last message. Essentially, we need an encoded message owner separate from `OutboundOpaqueMessage`. I...
This is similar to #1009. I would gladly work on a rewrite/redirect feature, but we must first define the scope and granularity to configure it.
Hi @ta2013, I am currently working on a URL rewriting feature and was wondering if a system like the one proposed in issue #1161 would meet your needs. Please let...