Wengier
Wengier
@MasterO2 As a command originally from *nix systems, LS command has a lot of *nix-like options. I hope to clean up and convert some particularly useful ones to DOS style...
Piping is supported via PR #1517.
@kcgen I certainly understand the purpose you mentioned, since I have similar experiences. For example, Linux provides both ``dir`` and ``ls`` commands, and I personally usually use the former. But...
@kcgen When we use the internal command shell and internal implementation of LS command, it is relatively easy to fix them (I did have sample fixes in the X code)....
Strictly speaking neither LS nor LESS is a standard DOS command, but they have been ported to DOS as part of DJGPP for a long time. FreeDOS later bundles them...
I implemented MORE command and fix for LS command in PR #1556.
@Banjo-Oz I agree it is better to provide some more details (at least) for this question as @kcgen mentioned above. Thanks for your support.
DOSBox-X does support this feature. I implemented commands like FOR to it earlier: https://github.com/joncampbell123/dosbox-x/releases
@dreamer The semantics of the FOR command in MS-DOS 6.x and MS-DOS 7.x (Windows 9x) are virtually the same, with only the addition of optional long filename support in the...
@dreamer DOSBox-X also reports a DOS version number of 5.0 by default, but it is certainly not a fixed value, but can be customized via the "ver" option in [dos]...