Pieter Visser

@SharkPool-SP Yeah those points are valid, but it is all about the compilation, that adds new depth. Maybe a subset could be added, that would still add value?

> > @SharkPool-SP > > > > > > > > Yeah those points are valid, but it is all about the compilation, that adds new depth. Maybe a subset...

@SharkPool-SP Its all about the compilation back to Scratch block, yes there is a lot of overlap with other extensions, that is on purpose and unavoidable, but allows for the...

> Oh, it's a very useful extension, but I'm afraid it won't make it to the TurboWarp gallery because it has too many blocks. In addition, this "Scratch Plus" extension...

@NexusKitten You have some great and valid points there: 1. The name is open for change, this was just the coolest and most fitting name I came up with. But...

> For what this is, this is not worth the insane amount of effort that would be required to maintain it, you are also in violation the the Scratch trademark...

> after looking at this again, it would be a more reasonable idea to scrap everything except the compile blocks. > > You could just make the extension have wrapper...

Hi, Quick questions: Has @GarboMuffin in mean time looked into this pull request? Or if anything is still of value within the extension? When any new developments happen please notify...