Results 54 comments of Colin

The Calf EQ currently looks like this for me: ![screenshot_2028-07-07_11-16-15](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/1210751/7792271/4a193750-029f-11e5-8052-24ca802f14ae.png) I have to say, I like the current look better than the look in your screenshot. I'm not familiar with...

@michaelgregorius I agree with all the inadequacies you pointed out in the current implementation. Given the direction you intend to continue with this, I'm in support of merging this (after...

Seeing as how we have not been enforcing a feature freeze on any other PRs and we have no clear timeline for procuring a 1.2 release candidate, should we merge...

@budislav I don't follow 100%. Take the old Calf EQ layout shown in @michaelgregorius 's comment earlier: https://github.com/LMMS/lmms/pull/2068#issuecomment-105162567 . As is, it seems that both the new implementation _as well...

> for LADSPA layout every UI pattern like checkbox or slider would be placed one after the other but because of fixed height everything will just go to the right....

So should we merge this then? (after somebody pulls the branch, runs `$ rebase master` and then tests it again?)

@michaelgregorius Make sure you're correctly matching 32/64 bit. Somehow, I have both 32 and 64-bit versions of the ladspa plugins on my system, at /usr/local/lib32 and /usr/local/lib. Point lmms to...

@Reaper10 in the future, try to provide some context when you link to another issue. For example, say something simple like "#1977 should be added to this list" so that...

So with these huge lists: if I want to discuss one specific item in depth, should I do it here or on the original issue that is linked (even though...

Emulating M20-M32 would be fairly trivial. You could even set it to read from the same directory where Octoprint stores its files (~/.octoprint/uploads) to avoid some unnecessary disk usage. One...