Vypo

Perhaps I misunderstood the crate's description: a high-level API for programmatically interacting with web pages through WebDriver? It seems like most browser automation use cases will require retries, and having...

> I think I still don't quite understand the desire to have this timeout logic in fantoccini itself? It seems more reasonable to me to have a method that retries...

> I'm not sure I follow this? You still need `tokio` to drive `fantoccini`, so you must already have that as a dependency? And `tokio` has `tokio::time::Timeout`. So I'm not...

> For example, if we wanted to support clicking either of two elements, we'd have to support a `select` combinator, which already exists in futures. Pulling that in as well...

Thinking about this a bit more, I think my main complaint about the current fantoccini API is that I can't add convenience methods on an extension trait generically for all...

I've been hacking in [support for signing transactions in the `Contract` API][0], and ran into this issue. My [naive approach][1] doesn't seem to work, so I'm wondering if there's been...

@tomusdrw It seems odd that I have to manually add the 32,000 gas (I assume for contract creation), and even with a 10% overestimate, it still fails. I'll keep playing...

Thanks for getting back to me! I didn't realize there was already some functionality for this. I noticed a couple files hanging around, and naively searched for `Drop` in [`multipart_form_data_field.rs`](https://github.com/magiclen/rocket-multipart-form-data/blob/master/src/multipart_form_data_field.rs)...

> Is there any benefit to add a lifetime which is not necessary? I would say so. It clearly indicates to the developer that the `SingleFileField` is only valid for...