VladimirMorozov

Oh, thanks, didn't notice this issue, since the title was about something different. I too think that it's more important to document legally verifiable truth than what some mappers in...

@Florimondable because highway=cycleway with foot=designated is a perfectly valid tagging. The real world example is the road sign I posted in the first comment and it can be tagged differently....

> If I'm not mistaking, this is case S7 in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle which indeed is a valid tagging scheme worldwide. >Note that this is however different than the "segregated" tagging scheme...

Here are some examples that this tagging of combined ways as a cycleway is actually used (the green ones are cycleways with foot=designated): Copenhagen  Stockholm  Edinburgh  ```...

Ummm you don't really prove anything by those examples. I don't know what to say. Some are bad tagging, but not all. Others are bad tagging in your **personal** opinion....

Tagging for the renderer is considered bad. Even if it is a change from one valid scheme to another valid scheme, I don't think that it should be done.

Shouldn't it be also tagged with cycleway=lane which would render that a bicycle lane exists? This is a case for a one-way road, but would be incorrect for a two-way...

> > Some examples of non-`designated` segregated paths that I have tagged recently, on Mapillary: > https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/cAGs_AO9jDMCWBK5yWfAOw > https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/EBqLADoy4cvkpDyNdIaKpQ Hello, just want to be sure. These yellow road markings don't...

I won't open a separate issue, as this is just an idea you gave me. I think bicycle parking could be improved even further if it's type is rendered at...

More ideas from me - military=academy (not displayed) - amenity=training (displayed, but not classified exactly) - amenity=research_institute (displayed, but not classified exactly) - leisure = disc_golf_course (not displayed) - power=tower...