VincentBailly
VincentBailly
Thank you @3dc1d3 for the quick reply. I think that you misunderstood my issue. I re-worded it so hopefully now it is clearer.
If it can help, the bug can also be reproduced by using `:x/[^s]*/` instead of `:y/s/`. With the difference that in this case, the last `v` is not selected.
Yes, It was specified in the title but not in the description, I updated the description to make it harder to miss.
It would be way easier to implement if we enforce that the ranges added are ranges that are already resolved in the lock file via other dependencies. How strict do...