VChristiaens
VChristiaens
Thanks for taking the lead as editor @jfm, and thanks @jgagneastro and @QuentChangeat for accepting to review this submission! I have implemented your first suggestions in my latest push @jgagneastro....
Hi @QuentChangeat, thank you for your feedback! 1. I have now updated the home page of the documentation as suggested; 2. I have now made the reference to the paper...
Hi @jgagneastro - no worries, sorry to hear you caught the bug but glad you recovered! Thanks for your comments! I have now updated the relevant part of the documentation...
Thanks for the suggestion, I have now updated the paper draft including a comparison to ``splat``. I am a bit reluctant to add it on the readthedocs documentation though, mainly...
You're right this is risky (I do not know either whether these were tested at low spectral resolution). At the moment, a warning is raised when the routines calculating spectral...
@arfon - thanks for your prompt reply. There was a [2017 paper in AJ](https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017AJ....154....7G/abstract), which presented a previous release of the package. However significant additions and changes were implemented to...
@editorialbot generate pdf
Hi @christinahedges thank you for your feedback! I have now added a discussion of similar tools in the first paragraph of the statement of need, as requested. I have also...
@editorialbot generate pdf
Since the definition used by JOSS for potential conflict of interest is quite strict, it is difficult for me to come up with someone that hasn't collaborated with any of...