Ty Dunn

Exalate commented: TyDunn commented: Anything you would add @akelad? We have discussed this in the past

Exalate commented: TyDunn commented: Context behind past decision to not execute actions in test stories: [https://forum.rasa.com/t/snapshot-based-testing-with-rasa/13318](https://forum.rasa.com/t/snapshot-based-testing-with-rasa/13318)

Exalate commented: TyDunn commented: I really think we should make running the actions a possibility, especially given another data point that Ella added to the Slack thread yesterday. I'm adding...

Exalate commented: TyDunn commented: From a high level, this seems like a fair overview at first glance. Curious to also hear what @wochinge thinks, since he spent some time in...

Exalate commented: TyDunn commented: > Something we should consider though, is that you might not want to run your "prod custom action" because that might be modifying real world data....

@shadow-blade-X Are you still working on this?

@tmbo This super cool! Sorry for the delay on this one. It slipped through the cracks. Do you think we should continue to support `rasa shell` as well? If so,...

Hmm. Not really. What about users running Rasa Open Source on headless servers? For example, we are using a GCP VMs for user tests today and won't have access to...

> I think this is a discussion we should also have with the community as there might be other hidden use cases for rasa shell. Yeah, I was talking to...

I think we need to figure out a plan with `rasa shell` if we were to merge this. We don't have too many more urgent priorities right now, so I...