toktar

Hello @tomusdrw , could you please review and merge this PR? Thanks in advance!

Hello @TelegramSam, thank you for sharing your opinion. The Community considered the observations mentioned above (and other arguments) during the voting over a month ago. > I think this decision...

Thanks for this discussion and new ideas. At the last contributors call, we discussed the following ideas: - We need to divide PoC and MVP phases. - Approving PR to...

Some **design/roadmap updates** for better background understanding. - Deprecate Indy2 method in favor of using did:ethr contract and specification - CL Registry: implement event approach matching to did:ethr design -...

Hello. @WadeBarnes Thanks for your ideas. But why do you say that removing the plugin ledger (non-empty) will compromise the integrity of the system? From the point of view of...

@esplinr This can be not easy due to the opening of the database in multiple threads. But we believe that this can be solved and will take several days.

> Do we anticipate more than one besu-based ledger? On first pass, it references the besu ledger as a singular thing. Do you mean instances of Indy-Besu networks or ledgers...

@TelegramSam Thanks a lot for your review. Updated according to your comments. Could you please take a look at it with all the rigor and with fresh eyes?

The third type is action requests from indy-node. We need to add general description for action handlers. https://github.com/hyperledger/indy-node/blob/master/docs/source/requests.md#action-requests

Hello @vdsilveira ! Sorry for a delay. Could you share the error message and specification link, you used as a design? Guilty of wanting to see the Revocation delta and...