Tarik Gul
Tarik Gul
> I'm sure outside contributions would be very welcome, I'd advise maybe tackling this issue in smaller chunks to keep the core devs in the loop of where it's up...
@chungquantin Yea I will post a set of sub-tasks soon that can get done with the following issue. For now I am going to get it started by removing the...
For starters I am thinking we should instead have a `Coretime (Experimental)` where we can iterate on the new coretime UI without having to remove and play with any existing...
@seadanda Thanks so much for the explanation its super helpful. > I'm not sure I know what you mean about the new logic. Are you talking about the code for...
As a suggestion by Alex Birdo, probably best to just remove the confusion by removing the text for now then, we can add it back in when corrected.
Known issue. I am working on a fix to get the staking pages sorted and fixed.
Yea you definitely brought up a great point with the claimedRewards. I have been trying to clean it up in the derives for the past 3 hours as this is...
Fixed via https://github.com/polkadot-js/api/pull/5862
`this.api.derive.staking.query(validatorAddress,{withLedger:true, withClaimedRewardsEras: true})` Will add a `claimedRewardsEras` field. Then you can combine `legacyClaimedRewards` with `claimedRewardsEras` in order to see all the eras
@Ank4n Have you anything similar to this? Pjs api is just returning `legacyClaimedRewards`, and the new `ClaimedRewards` from the node so I would doubt any of the data is wrong...