Andreas Strauman
Andreas Strauman
Simple LaTeX test case: ``` \documentclass{minimal} \def\once{Once} \begin{document} \once upon a time there was an \undefined control sequence. \end{document} ``` Expected log output:
> Having tests that cover cases where a macro is not found would be amazing, but not strictly required. I'll see if I get the time.
I'm on Spark 3.1.0, and it's showing wrong. Also the number of zeros are wrong.
"Workaround" would be to set e.g. ``` \pgfplotsset{/pgfplots/group/.cd, horizontal sep=0.5cm, vertical sep=0.5cm } ``` Inside the fig env
> So in some sense it's step 4 that doesn't work. Ie. focus remains at the scratch window in monitor 1. You're right! Didn't catch that. The focus remains at...
> Moreover, as is probably what you're inferring, if step 4 is replaced by using the mouse to change focus to monitor 2, then step 5 does in fact work....
I totally agree @DohmenICT! How awesome and slick it would be to just simply slide the temp instead of clicking. Maybe even vertically too? Then you could put It side...
@kylebarron I was not thinking about the _document's_ settings, but the user settings of your amazing atom plugin. If it's not possible, then it's not possible :)
Will fix