Charles-P. Lajoie

I think that's another way of showing the same thing using Eddie's approach in his [gist](https://gist.github.com/schlafly/a50a27411bdc706c69e093d083a4b6db): for odd oversampling, the Scipy and Astropy convolutions give (visually) the same things, whereas...

Right - as @obi-wan76 pointed out, Astropy Boxkernel2D returns an odd-size kernel regardless of the width specified, so that's one difference with the Scipy approach used above. With that said,...

Essentially, as a first pass, we'd like to do something like what we did during commissioning, in our OTE-28 "in-focus PSF checks" activity: For various instruments/detectors, we'd like to measure...

Just stumbled upon this open issue; Is there a high-spatial frequency for Roman available at this point in time @AldenJurling. I'm not sure what was communicated via email back then.

Thanks to our colleagues at GSFC, I've received an “as built PM" OPD file for Roman. I'll have to trim the edges, as recommended, and remove the lower-order Zernike terms...

I stumbled upon this issue and decided to take a closer look at it. It appears the only change that needs to be done is add a line for `FND`...

Github won't let me attach a `.tsv` file, so I'll just paste the content here since it's short. To be absolutely clear, this is to replace the `filters.tsv` file under...

Marcio gave me the link to where the new webbpsf data reside until the next release (on STScI central store), so I just dropped the updated file there.